Comparison · 7 min · For Owners

The decision in one line

For businesses under about 75 employees, an MSP is almost always the right call. Between 75 and 150 employees, the math gets closer, and the answer is usually co-managed (in-house IT person plus an MSP for the layers they can't realistically cover alone). Above 150–200, you have enough scale to justify a real internal IT team — though most still keep an MSP relationship for security operations and after-hours.

The fully-loaded cost of one IT person

Owners often anchor on the salary number, which is misleading. The real cost of an in-house IT hire is:

LineRange
Salary (mid-level IT generalist, 2026)$60,000–$95,000
Benefits (healthcare, retirement, FICA, etc.)25–30% of salary
Tooling (RMM, EDR, ticketing, security stack)$5,000–$15,000/yr
Training and certification$2,000–$5,000/yr
PTO coverage (vacation, sick, parental)2–4 weeks/yr uncovered or covered ad hoc
All-in annual cost$90,000–$150,000/yr

And one person doesn't cover 24/7. If your network goes down at 2 AM, your in-house person is asleep. If they're at the dentist, the help desk is closed. If they leave, the institutional knowledge leaves with them.

What an MSP includes at the same price point

For a 25-person professional-services firm, the same $90,000–$150,000 annual budget is dramatically more than the MSP cost. A reference example:

And the MSP brings: 24/7 SOC monitoring, EDR with response runbook, written incident-response plan, BAA, annual risk assessment, restore-tested backups, dedicated technical account advisor, after-hours emergency line, depth of bench (the person who specializes in M365 isn't the same person who specializes in Ubiquiti), and continuity (the relationship survives any individual leaving).

Where in-house wins

In-house IT has genuine advantages:

Where MSPs win

The hybrid: co-managed IT

For mid-sized businesses (~75–300 employees) the answer is rarely either / or. It's both. The internal IT person owns the relationships, the LOB software, and the day-to-day; the MSP owns the layers they realistically can't (24/7 SOC, EDR, patching at scale, backup with restore-testing, after-hours response, specialist deep-dives). See co-managed IT vs. fully managed for the operational detail.

The honest decision matrix

You are...Recommended model
Under 25 employeesMSP, fully managed
25–75 employees, no IT person todayMSP, fully managed
25–75 employees, one IT person today doing wellCo-managed (keep them, add MSP for security ops + after-hours)
75–150 employeesCo-managed
150–300 employeesCo-managed or in-house team with MSP security ops
300+ employeesIn-house team; MSP for specialty layers only

Frequently asked questions

Is it cheaper to have in-house IT or hire an MSP?
For most businesses under 100 employees, an MSP is meaningfully cheaper than a single in-house IT hire — and provides more depth of coverage. The fully-loaded cost of one mid-level IT person (salary plus benefits plus tools plus training plus PTO coverage) is typically $90,000–$130,000 per year. The same business would spend $20,000–$60,000 per year on an MSP and get 24/7 coverage, EDR, SOC, backup, identity, and a deeper bench than one person.
When does in-house IT actually make sense?
Around 75–100 employees and growing, with on-prem infrastructure, custom line-of-business software, or unique compliance scope where the institutional knowledge is worth a salary. Below that, the MSP math wins. Above ~150 employees, most businesses go hybrid — in-house IT plus a co-managed MSP relationship for the layers an individual can't realistically own.
What does an in-house IT person actually cost when fully loaded?
Salary $60,000–$95,000 plus 25–30% benefits = $75,000–$125,000. Plus tooling ($5,000–$15,000/year for RMM, EDR, ticketing, security tools the MSP would bundle). Plus training ($2,000–$5,000/year to keep current). Plus the cost of PTO coverage (vacation, sick, parental leave) when nobody's watching the systems. All-in: $90,000–$150,000/year for one IT person. And one person doesn't cover 24/7.
What about co-managed IT — having both?
Co-managed is the right answer for many mid-sized businesses (75–300 employees). The internal IT person owns the human relationships, the LOB software vendor calls, and the day-to-day. The MSP owns the layers a one-person team can't realistically cover alone — 24/7 monitoring, EDR/SOC, patching at scale, backup with restore-testing, after-hours response. Together they're stronger than either alone.
What if we already have an in-house IT person — should we switch to an MSP?
Probably not. Most businesses with an existing in-house IT person are better served by adding a co-managed MSP relationship than by replacing the person. The institutional knowledge is valuable; the gaps are in the layers that need 24/7 coverage and specialized tooling. See the co-managed article for what each side owns.

Related reading